Oversight of EPA"s Superfund Innovation Technology Evaluation (SITE) program
Read Online

Oversight of EPA"s Superfund Innovation Technology Evaluation (SITE) program hearing before the Subcommittee on Natural Resources, Agriculture Research, and Environment of the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, U.S. House of Representatives, One Hundred First Congress, first session, July 17, 1989. by United States. Congress. House. Committee on Science, Space, and Technology. Subcommittee on Natural Resources, Agriculture Research, and Environment.

  • 533 Want to read
  • ·
  • 9 Currently reading

Published by U.S. G.P.O., For sale by the Supt. of Docs., Congressional Sales Office in Washington .
Written in English



  • United States.


  • United States. Environmental Protection Agency.,
  • Hazardous wastes -- Technological innovations -- United States.

Book details:

LC ClassificationsKF27 .S3978 1989d
The Physical Object
Paginationiii, 94 p. ;
Number of Pages94
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL1813802M
LC Control Number89603462

Download Oversight of EPA"s Superfund Innovation Technology Evaluation (SITE) program


• WATER: By the end of , EPA closed seven WIFIA loans totaling nearly $2 billion to help finance over $4 billion for water infrastructure projects and create up to 6, jobs. • LAND: EPA deleted all or part of 22 sites from Superfund's National Priorities List in FY - the largest number of deletions in one year since FY Smita Siddhanti, PhD (President) Dr. Siddhanti founded EnDyna following a successful year career with leading consulting firms. A nationally recognized expert in risk assessment and management, Dr. Siddhanti has supported the US Environmental Protection Agency's radiation, waste management, Superfund, drinking water, and pesticide programs. EPA risk-assessment concepts, principles, and practices are products of many diverse factors, and each agency program is based on a “unique mixture of statutes, precedents, and stakeholders” (EPA a, p. 14). With respect to statutes, Congress established the basic plan through a series of environmental laws, most enacted during the s and most authorizing science-based regulatory. 4 Compliance costs include direct compliance costs and state oversight costs. For this regulatory impact analysis, direct compliance costs and state oversight costs provide a reasonable proxy to assess the final UST regulation’s social costs. See Chapter for further discussion.

groundwater (Technology Innovation) 6 Technology Innovation and Field Services Division. Provides information about characterization and treatment technologies (Clu-in, TechDirect, TechTrends, Case Studies, Technical Overviews) Advocates more effective, less costly technologies; http// Provides national leadership for the delivery of. EA ENGINEERING, SCIENCE, AND TECHNOLOGY, INC. EPS RARA03L2 Conduct Remedial Action to implement Phases 1A and 2A of the remedial design at the Atlantic Wood Industries Superfund Site in Portsmouth, Virginia. The Office of Management & Budget’s Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP) issued a November 5, memorandum entitled “Service Contract Inventories” (PDF – 12 pages, KB) that provides guidance on preparing the inventories. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) service contract inventories met all of OFPP requirements on data elements and structure. KEYNOTE SPEAKER. Grant R. Trigger is the Michigan Cleanup Manager for the Revitalizing Auto Communities Environmental Response (“RACER”) Trust and oversees a $ million-dollar fund for the cleanup and redevelopment of 36 former GM properties in Michigan. He has a degree in Environmental Sciences Engineering from the University of Michigan and is a cum laude graduate of the University .

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is an independent agency, specifically an independent executive agency, of the United States federal government for environmental protection. President Richard Nixon proposed the establishment of EPA on July 9, ; it began operation on December 2, , after Nixon signed an executive order establishing the EPA was ratified by committee Agency executives: Andrew R. Wheeler, Administrator, . Model 1: Private Regulation with State Oversight The first model, and the one with the widest support, was a model that sought to harness the resources of private regulators and put them at the disposal of the state. The argument advanced there is essentially that the job of regulation is a demanding and difficult one that the state cannot do File Size: 1MB. Full text of "Superfund reauthorization: hearing before the Subcommittee on Commerce, Trade, and Hazardous Materials of the Committee on Commerce, House of Representatives, One Hundred Fourth Congress, first session, Ma " See other formats. Technology Innovation Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery Office of Underground Technology/Management Superfund Cost Accounting. Science Policy: Quality Assurance. Budget, Finance, Contracts Superfund Sites • National Superfund Website • Site Evaluation and Cleanup Goals • Underground Storage Tanks.